ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – The Albuquerque Public College district is questioning why a charter school superintendent makes more income than the mayor of Albuquerque. That gap has shrunk because the 2008-09 school year when a U.S. Government Accountability Workplace report located that students with disabilities created up only 7.7 % of charter school enrollment nationally, versus 11.three % in district schools. GAO, June 2012: Many factors might support explain why enrollment levels of students with disabilities in charter schools and traditional public schools differ, but the info is anecdotal.
For instance, charter schools are schools of decision, so enrollment levels could differ since fewer parents of students with disabilities choose to enroll their young children in charter schools. Further, in particular instances, traditional public school districts play a function in the placement of students with disabilities in charter schools. In these instances, whilst charter schools participate in the placement method, they do not constantly make the final placement decisions for students with disabilities. Lastly, charter schools’ sources may possibly be constrained, generating it challenging to meet the wants of students with far more extreme disabilities.
The report noted that federal law, which calls for public charter schools to have an open admissions policy, particularly states that charter schools can not deny admissions to students primarily based on a disability. The Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights is accountable for investigating claims of discrimination, and only two % of all complaints regarding disabilities in 2010 were created against charter schools, according to the GAO report.
We are not saying that there aren’t charter schools that discourage or even outright deny students with disabilities from enrolling. Like all public schools, Harmony’s charter schools must be open to all students, which includes ELL students and students with disabilities,” Catherine E. Lhamon, assistant secretary for civil rights, stated in a press release.
But none of this is proof that most charter schools … don’t take the hardest-to-teach children,” as Clinton stated. As for expulsion prices, the Clinton campaign cited a July two, 2013, speech by Education Secretary Arnie Duncan to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. Particularly, the campaign pointed to a component of his speech exactly where Duncan known as on charter schools to minimize their prices of expulsions. That may possibly not be acceptable, but it is not proof that most charter schools … do not keep” the hardest-to-teach students. My elementary college was approximately 33% Black, 33% White and 33% Puerto Rican.