Educational Philosophy Of PAULO FREIRE.(For B.Ed And M.Ed Students)

Behind each and every college and every single teacher is a set of related beliefs-a philosophy of education-that influences what and how students are taught. Please do not try to teach if you never study Philosophy or no good at it. Excuse my anonymousness, and do not get me incorrect, not trying to be arrogant, but this is not what Plato signifies at all. More than the previous few years, I have discovered myself in a lot of different leadership positions. As a student who by no means really felt like I was academically on the same level as other students, getting conscious of developmental stages plays a robust role in my philosophy. I adore Piaget’s theories about cognitive development and the value of them inside education.

I agreed with Comenius’ tips about how education ought to be universal for all, regardless of social background, religion, sex or intellectual ability. I fond Pestalozzi’s philosophy to be very similar to Comenius’ in the sense that, as teachers, we are teaching the complete youngster. We can not count on students to recognize a certain idea, if they didn’t comprehend the concept that precedes it. I also agree that education must not be denied to anyone, no matter how poor or disabled.

The eight education philosophies are broken down into two categories: teacher-centered and student-centered. Education ought to start off with the person and the alternatives created by the individual. It is quite similar to pragmatism (which is yet another theory I connect to) in the sense that theorists in this philosophy are usually moving forward. Hence he learns to enjoy nature and to dislike the conventional guidelines of the society.

It was only for some time that he received a small education by his father informally at home and at early age he study ancient Greek and Roman literature. This job engaged his interest in education and motivated him to prepare his very first thesis, namely the ‘Project for the Education of M. De Sainte Maria,’ in which he has paid great attention towards the early social training (Khalid, 1998). In1750 he got a likelihood to participate in an essay competitors which was held by the Academy of Dijon. He also said that the aim of education need to be the liberty and happiness of the kid.

The topic of the essay was: Has the restoration of the arts and sciences contributed to the purification of morals?’This chance marked the beginning of his literary fame and of his anti social bias. The central claim of the work is that human beings are essentially good by nature, but were corrupted by the complicated historical events that resulted in present day civil society. The book is written in 1st particular person, with the narrator as the tutor, and describes his education of a pupil, Emile, from birth to adulthood (Khalid, 1998).